The Contemporary Conflict of Values :: Morals Ethics Papers

The Contemporary impinge of ValuesThe interlocking between valuates is the source of many struggles and problems today. In contrast to the traditional conflict of values, the contemporary conflict is distinguished by these features (1) extensiveness (2) complicatedness (3) profoundness and (4) continuousness. The plurality and relativity of values is the primary sheath of contemporary conflicts. The origin of pluralism lies in an interrelated trio of aspects commodity economy, elective politics, and individualism. The contemporary conflict of values is a historical process. Such conflict does not necessarily result in confusion on the contrary, it commode perchance lead to new and higher levels of harmony and vitality. In adjudicating value conflicts, we must (1) permit contrasting values to coexist and respect different choices and the pursuits of values by different individuals (2) consider the integral and the individual, the entire and the part, the long-term and the s hort-term, and attempt to have regard for both sides of the conflict and (3) pursue the crush and most suitable. 1.The conflict of values is not the unique phenomenon of our times and the common occurrence in both ancient and modern history. solely the traditional conflict of values occurred largely in the moral commonwealth, and its nerve and focus lay in the conflict between individual and whole interests. In the premodern times there were also conflicts between various requirements of the very(prenominal) individual self, but this conflict was also moralized because personal life, either sexual ideas or outeractions,were put into the scope of moral valuation. Furthermore, traditional ethical motive was double-valued morality of effectual and evil, and only the requirements benefiting the whole or another(prenominal)s was evaluated as moral. Therefore,the traditional conflict of values was in fact moral conflict between good and evil, and significance and function of morali ty just lay in adjusting and work out all those conflicts.Since the end of the 19th century,however,the conflict of values has become a universal phenomenon. In contrast with the traditional conflict of values, the contemporary conflict of values has four distinguishing charateristics(1) Extensiveness. Contemporary alliance is a legalized society, whose greatest oddment from moralized traditional society is that such society merely regulates the starting point, not all of peoples action, and it does not regulate peoples ideology. Thus in traditional society there was almost no possibility of choice in realms other than morality, while in contemporary society,in addition t law, there argon many realms possible for people to choose, so that the conflict of values possibly may take place both in the legal realm and other realms.