Homosexuality is abnormal.

Homo informality is ab conventionality.Have you ever seen fearless or lesbian volume in public in other words homo sexuals? If you have, what is your opinion on the issue? Do you feel it is something radiation diagram or abnormal? Michael Levin strongly believes that gayness is an influence that is absurd and abnormal. He states that homosexualism is abnormal and on that pointof it is unfavorable. He defends his opinion with several diametric argu workforcets. In his first argument, he states that same sex intimacy is a mis map of sexual variety meat. Then he goes on to say that homosexuality causes unhappiness. In conclusion, he states that the act of homosexuality should never be taken into consideration to become legalized since it is something against hu earthly concern nature. I strongly agree with Levin on his point of view about homosexuality. In this essay, I entrust be discussing Levins arguments for the view that homosexuality is abnormal.What Levin instrumen t by the word abnormal is something that is biologically un born(p) or in other words, against humankind nature. He doesnt toy with that homosexuality is immoral or sinful precisely for purely mechanically skillful reason it is a misuse of bodily separate. In his first argument, he states that misusing the bodys sexual organs could frustrate the intention of some purposeful agent. What Levin means by this is that if one is non heterosexual, he/she would be damaging their sexual organs which causes frustration and therefore, decreases happiness. He excessively points out that homosexuals argon a great deal unhappier than heterosexuals. His main argument on the misuse of body split is on grounds of natural selection, which he believes is also connected to the unhappiness of homosexuals. Levin argues that a man and a womans private parts are made for from each one other. To prove his point au consequentlytic, he gives an congresswoman about a individual named Mr. Jones wea ring his teeth as a necklace around his neck instead of using his teeth for the use of mastication. In other words, his teeth are world used for ornamentation. Another example was about a man named Mr. Smith he used his teeth for playing music something I in person find troublesome to imagine He concludes from these two examples that individuals who dont use their teeth for the reason of chewing will be selected out of the natural selection. In this example, he is comparing people who dont use their teeth for chewing to homosexuals what he is trying to deal clear is that homosexuals whitethorn be eliminated in the future from natural selection due to their misuse of their sexual organs. In other words, nature has created a specific job or escape for every single body part. Therefore, the accurate use of body parts crowns to happiness and the opposite is also certain. In my opinion, this is obviously common sense. Levin states the example that the male sex organ is used to ej aculate semen into the feminine sex organ by doing this, more offspring are produced and therefore the family tree expands. So when a homosexual uses his sexual organ in a way to insert his penis into another males anus, no desires will be fulfilled, and no offspring will be produced this causes unhappiness. The same is true for heterosexuals but they wont be as un beaming as homosexuals. later this statement he says, There are after all in truth jolly fat men. What he means by this phrase is that there really are fat people in this world that are extremely happy and have no job with being obese. He is comparing this example to homosexuals and heterosexuals. For example, a lazy person might be happy at some point in his life to a certain standard, but he is likely to be less happy than someone otherwise like him who exercises. Levin believes that calling homosexuality involuntary does not place it outside the scope of evolution. Victims of homosexuality are not blameworthy, but it is absurd to pretend that nothing is wrong with them Homosexual activists believe that transmittable causes exempt homosexuals from blame. What he means by this is that maybe homosexual people are born with traits that make them so. only if this position doesnt make this normal there is still something wrong with them and in this case it is something absurd and against human nature. He believes that people should try to solve this problem or complaint and should unquestionably defy this so called anomaly. This is why Levin strongly believes that homosexuality is abnormal. later Levin proved all his statements, he concluded that since the misuse of body parts is abnormal and will lead to unhappiness, then homosexuality can also be considered abnormal and that it leads to unhappiness as easy. Therefore, we as a party should oppose homosexuality.Levin feels that if performing an action that is very likely to lead to unhappiness, then the state should not legitimise that acti on by granting a expert to perform that act. The state should have no business encouraging actions that lead to unhappiness by creating rights or protections related to those them. Therefore, the state should not legitimize homosexual actions by granting a right to perform homosexual acts. Levin recognizes that level off if there is a correlation between homosexuality and unhappiness, it does not win that homosexuals should be denied rights under the law. However, Levin does worry that laws granting homosexuals the right to engage in anal intercourse (or to marry) would actually encourage homosexuality and thus those laws would increase unhappiness. He says that a state that suddenly grants a right to homosexuals might as well legitimize homosexual actions and thus encourage them. Its like saying lets make taking drugs legal. It causes unhappiness, suicides health problems, death and so on. Why would a disposal make something so bizarre legal? This is how Levin feels about the matter of homosexuality. peerless crucial test on Levins account is his prediction that homosexuals will save to be unhappy even if people altogether abandon their evil against homosexuality.My opinion on this issue is very similar to Levins attitude. I personally believe that homosexuality is against human nature and should not be an act that is accepted in todays society. It is true that God made man for woman. The sexual organs of a male should only be inserted to the sexual organs of a female. If homosexuality was something normal, then God would have allowed offspring to be born from two male or two female partners. But as you can see, this is not true. Therefore, it is wrong and deviant. I disagree with the fact that homosexual people were born with homosexual genes which make them so. There is no such thing. They are just people that are confused or have mental problems. No one is born with genes that make them gay or lesbian and I strongly believe this. There may be people born with sexual deficiencies but this does not mean that homosexuality is an alternative solution for them. Levin is right to state that it causes unhappiness because that is true but that should not be the reason why homosexuality should be viewed as abnormal. Recently, the American Psychiatric Association announced Surely the term has come for psychiatry to give up the archaic practice of classifying the millions of men and women who accept or prefer homosexual object choices as being by virtue of that face alone, mentally ill. The fact that their alternative life style happens to be out of favor with current cultural conventions must not be a basis in itself for a diagnosis. In my opinion, this is the commencement of a disaster in todays society. When this association announces something like this, its like they are saying that this is something that is normal and accepted in todays society and that the government should incite this and give homosexuals rights just like the rest of the population. Some people may be wondering as to why I am qualification such a big deal about this matter. The reason I am so concerned is because this issue will have a negative effect on our children and our future society. By people pass judgment this would be a way of admitting that there is not a problem with being homosexual. Even though people may think that homosexuality is harmless, it actually is in fact extremely detrimental.